Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
After Further Review / Re: Somebody missed a few history classes
« Last post by Tom Ace on Today at 08:26:55 AM »
I actually partially agree here with Sol. Not about the linguistic acrobatics he’s attempting but I do believe that even if Russia “interfered” Trump would have won anyway.  I’ve said many times before that he tapped into something this country was feeling. They were sick of the old politicians and they wanted a change. He apparently also tapped into some really dark white supremacist as well but those numbers didn’t carry the day. 

That all being said, if those who were indicted “interfered” in the election they will not have the defense of “well... trump woulda won anyway”.  The same will be true if collusion is proven.

It's possible he would have won anyway, but considering how narrow his victory was, it's reasonable to posit that the interference tipped the scales just enough for him.  The way it worked out, every little bit mattered.  He won three key states by a total of 79,000 votes.  He essentially won the election due to those 79,000 extra votes in those places. 

2
After Further Review / Re: Somebody missed a few history classes
« Last post by Tom Ace on Today at 08:13:43 AM »
Impossible to know, since you haven’t seen the intelligence reports about it.

Oh, good, you're going the crazy old man kburjr route.   roll1

Quote
Why would any of it be classified ?  Why does it take 2 years to release a report ?  Why is any of this bound up at the highest levels of government, and not turned over to law enforcement ?  I was under the impression you were claiming these were criminal acts.

1) You're ignoring the fact that we do have a good bit of information already.  We have enough to have a handle on what happened.  We just don't know all the specifics. 

2) Not really interested in your questions aimed at deflecting. 

Quote
ooo, all caps !  Why so touchy ?  It’s not as though you even voted for or against Trump anyway, so I’m not sure why you think it’s valid to complain.

Because you're trying to paint it as me just buying into the narrative because it's from the democrats and anti-Trump.  You went so far as to cross out the info from the link that specifically contradicts your accusations and then pretended that info doesn't exist.  The fact is all of our intelligence agencies have concluded Russia interfered  in favor of Trump, and the recent GOP-led investigation concluded that they are correct.  This is not a partisan conclusion. 

Quote
When did I ever say Russia didn’t do anything ?  I’m just poking holes in your weirdo follow-on conclusions that any of it means anything.

Yup, truly a weirdo follow-on conclusion that Russia interfering with our election to help the candidate they like win is a big deal.  Yup, nothing to see here.  One of our biggest enemies over the past 60 years taking concerted steps to influence our election in their favor is just no big deal, no need to worry or do anything about that little thing. 

Quote
Oh, so please provide a link where you explain what they did.  I’d love to know how your little mind works, that leaking 3rd party-obtained email from an account password gained via phishing, detailing one party’s outright treachery constitutes “interference”. 

Did Eric Trump facilitate Debbie Wasserman Schultz stabbing Bernie Sanders in the back, fund the Russian dossier, and allow a candidate to take over the DNC ?  I’ll bet he did, that shifty genius bastard !

Again, it's just sad that we're at the point where so many people are just like "Meh, who cares" to Russia running a campaign to influence our elections.  It's truly a sign of how far down the tubes we are. 
3
After Further Review / Re: Corrected: Gaping literary hole
« Last post by BuccinGator on Today at 08:07:14 AM »
You would have lost your mind under the Overlords.

Sort of like what's happening to RuminationGuy right now?
4






... I still can’t find the part where nunes disproves the dossier


 monkeypee1




where’s the video that shows that shiit didn’t happen?








...








Does that have to be proven, though? It sounds to me that at a minimum, some or none of the extensions of the warrant should have been granted, no matter what else is in play here.
5
So instead of asking for a FISA warrant in the name of Trump they target someone that may have a connection with Trump during election time in the hope they could see if Trump might be connected...

Did this person stay at Trump Tower?

I hope not. Or at least I hope they destroyed the microwave.
6






... I still can’t find the part where nunes disproves the dossier


 monkeypee1




where’s the video that shows that shiit didn’t happen?








...
It's so cute how you Libtards still are hanging on to what is characterized as a politically motivated and financed piece of biased garbage.
7







... I still can’t find the part where nunes disproves the dossier


 monkeypee1




where’s the video that shows that shiit didn’t happen?








...






8
After Further Review / Re: Corrected: Gaping literary hole
« Last post by NFL-Solomon on Today at 06:35:24 AM »
Welcome, Earthling.
You would have lost your mind under the Overlords.
9
facepalm

If you're saying that, I'm going to guess you haven't read through any of it,
But whatever.
No, I have, but it looks like you fell for the unsubstantiated left wing echo chamber.
10
After Further Review / Re: So the Nunes memo on the FBI gets released today...
« Last post by Fog on Yesterday at 11:54:54 PM »
So instead of asking for a FISA warrant in the name of Trump they target someone that may have a connection with Trump during election time in the hope they could see if Trump might be connected...

Did this person stay at Trump Tower?
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10